# Hague court rejects Rwanda's £50m compensation claim against the UK over the scrapped deportation scheme > The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague dismissed all of Rwanda's financial claims against the United Kingdom on 1 June 2026, ruling that a November 2024 diplomatic exchange had constituted a mutual agreement to forgo outstanding payments under the cancelled asylum deportation deal **Meta:** type: event · date: 2026-06-01 · heads: 누가 결정하는가, 그들이 말하지 않는 것 · 3 takes · 3 lenses · 2 regions ## Summary The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague ruled on 1 June 2026 that Rwanda's financial claims against the [United Kingdom](/ko/entity/united-kingdom) arising from the cancellation of the Rwanda asylum deportation scheme were inadmissible. Rwanda had filed for arbitration in January 2026, seeking approximately £50m in compensation (the annual payment the UK had promised under the Rwanda Development Support Package but which had not been transferred after the scheme's cancellation). The UK government, which cancelled the scheme on taking office in July 2024 under then-Prime Minister Keir Starmer, argued that a November 2024 diplomatic exchange with Kigali constituted a mutual agreement to forgo outstanding obligations. The PCA upheld that argument, rejecting all of Rwanda's financial claims. The underlying scheme, under which the UK paid Rwanda £240m and relocated only four asylum seekers at an estimated total cost of £700m, had been scrapped in full. Starmer replaced it with the Border Security Command. The PCA ruling formally closes the financial liability chapter. ## The split The UK government welcomed the ruling as vindication of its approach to unwinding the scheme. Rwanda's government said it was "disappointed" and "reserve[d] the right to take any appropriate future steps." UK opposition parties, particularly the Conservatives who designed the scheme, argued the ruling ignored the fundamental point that Rwanda had built and committed infrastructure based on UK promises. Migration-policy critics noted the ruling says nothing about whether the scheme's legal architecture was valid or whether the UK could reintroduce a similar policy, which some in the Conservative and Reform parties have proposed. ## By the numbers - £50m, annual payment Rwanda sought in the arbitration (approximately €115m equivalent) - £240m, total UK payments to Rwanda before scheme cancellation - 4, asylum seekers actually deported to Rwanda under the scheme - £700m, estimated total UK cost of the Rwanda plan including legal, administrative and accommodation expenses - January 2026, date Rwanda filed the arbitration claim at the PCA - July 2024, date UK PM Starmer cancelled the scheme on taking office ## Why it matters The ruling removes a financial liability from the UK government's books, but its real significance is precedential. Third-country asylum deals of the Rwanda type are under active consideration in the EU (Italy-Albania, Denmark-various African states) and in several EU member states. The PCA finding that a diplomatic cancellation note can constitute a mutual release of financial obligations could affect how future such deals are structured and what risk premium partners demand. ## What to watch - Whether Rwanda pursues other legal avenues despite the PCA ruling. - Whether the UK Labour government under Burnham introduces any new third-country partnership mechanism for asylum seekers. - Whether the PCA precedent affects ongoing EU-member-state third-country asylum deals. - Whether Conservative and Reform leadership use the scheme's history as a campaign issue in any upcoming UK election. ## Regional takes (batched by bias / lens) ### Global broadcaster; most complete English-language account of the arbitration ruling and its legal basis - **Al Jazeera** (Global, en) — Reported that the Permanent Court of Arbitration rejected Rwanda's claim that the UK owed approximately £50m per year in outstanding payments under the Rwanda Development Support Package. The tribunal found that a November 2024 diplomatic exchange, in which the UK government indicated it was cancelling the scheme, constituted a mutual agreement to forgo the financial claims. Rwanda had filed the case in January 2026 seeking approximately £50m total. > "International court rejects Rwanda's claim over UK migration deal, ruling a 2024 diplomatic exchange settled the financial question." Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/1/international-court-rejects-rwandas-claim-over-uk-migration-deal ### EU-focused broadcaster; covered the ruling with emphasis on what it means for European migration deal architecture - **Euronews** (Europe, en) — Reported the ruling using the euro figure of €115m equivalent, noting the PCA found that the UK's cancellation of the scheme, communicated to Kigali via diplomatic note in late 2024 under PM Starmer, had implicitly terminated Rwanda's financial entitlement. Contextualised the ruling within EU debate over whether third-country asylum partnerships can sustain legal and financial obligations when governments change. > "Court rejects Rwanda's €115m claim against the UK over the scrapped migrant deportation deal." Source: https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/06/01/court-rejects-rwandas-115-million-claim-against-uk-over-scrapped-migrant-deal ### unlabelled - **Wikipedia** (Global, en) — Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwanda_asylum_plan ## Across the graph - Related: [[uk-starmer-burnham-succession]] - Entities: United Kingdom, Org:icj --- Canonical: https://rbtfl.xyz/ko/n/uk-rwanda-ruling-jun26