rbtfl

Section 201 solar tariffs lapse as a Section 232 polysilicon probe looms

An eight-year safeguard on imported panels expired in February; a national-security polysilicon case could reshape US solar supply chains again

Energy·Minerals· pending-decision Whose Money·The Quiet Shift ·8 takes ·
post

The split

The same story, as told by newsrooms in different countries. Their words, attributed and linked.

United States

Solar Power World

“End of an era: Section 201 tariffs on imported solar panels expire.”

solar-industry traderead the original ↗

United Kingdom

PV Tech

“Section 232 polysilicon tariffs could be clarified by 'end of the month'.”

PV manufacturingread the original ↗

post

Summary

The US Section 201 safeguard on crystalline-silicon Solar modules expired on 6 February 2026 after eight years, ending at a 14% terminal rate. But the trade wall around Renewables is being rebuilt elsewhere: Section 301 duties on Chinese-origin cells, modules, polysilicon and wafers remain, 50%+ on some products, and a Section 232 national-security investigation into polysilicon, opened July 2025, could hit every product containing it, including wafers and cells. Reciprocal 2025 tariffs also bite Southeast Asian routes (Vietnam 46%, Cambodia 49%, Thailand 36%, Malaysia 24%). The net effect reshuffles import economics even as US demand and storage grow.

By the numbers

  • 6 Feb 2026, Section 201 expiry, at a 14% final rate (8 years total).
  • 50%+, Section 301 duties on some Chinese solar products.
  • July 2025, Section 232 polysilicon probe opened.
  • 46% / 49% / 36% / 24%, reciprocal tariffs on Vietnam/Cambodia/Thailand/Malaysia.

Why it matters

Tariff layers decide whether US solar deployment runs on imports or a still-nascent domestic manufacturing base. A broad polysilicon 232 action would touch nearly every panel sold and could either spur factories or raise project costs into a high-demand, transmission-constrained market.

What to watch

  • The Section 232 polysilicon determination and its scope.
  • Whether 201's lapse lowers landed module prices in practice.
  • Domestic cell/wafer capacity response to the tariff mix.

The briefing, by email