rbtfl

BTS withdraws from Grammy consideration, rejecting new Best Asian Pop Music category as segregation

All seven members of South Korean group BTS announced on July 29 they would not submit music for Grammy consideration this year, apparently protesting the Recording Academy's creation of a new Best Asian Pop Music category; the move was backed publicly by millions of fans who argued the separate category demotes K-pop to a consolation prize rather than integrating it into general-field competition

司法· active 誰が決めるのか·語られていないこと ·5 論調 · ·rbtfl 更新 2026年7月30日
投稿

報道の分かれ

同じニュースを、各国のニュースルームがどう伝えたか。引用は出典つきで原文にリンク。

United States

Time

“The massively popular K-pop boyband announced they would not submit for consideration for the Recording Academy's awards.”

US cultural and political magazine原文を読む ↗

South Korea

Korea Times

“The US Recording Academy has defended its creation of a new Asian pop category after K-pop supergroup BTS announced it would not submit.”

South Korean English-language press原文を読む ↗

United States

GoldDerby

“All seven members post identical Instagram message in a critique of the new Grammy category, which fans say is a consolation prize.”

US awards-industry specialist outlet原文を読む ↗

投稿

Summary

All seven members of Bts posted simultaneous statements on July 29 announcing they would not submit music for Grammy consideration this year. The apparent trigger was the Recording Academy's creation of a new Best Asian Pop Music category, which Bts fans argued creates a separate, lower-prestige track that prevents Asian artists from competing in Record of the Year and Album of the Year. The Academy defended the category; Bts has not responded to the defence. The boycott, backed by the group's global fanbase, drew wide coverage as a test of whether non-Western artists can shift industry norms through collective withdrawal.

Why it matters

Bts is commercially large enough that its withdrawal is a material event for the Grammy broadcast: the group's fanbase drives streaming and award-show viewership globally. The boycott articulates a structural critique, not a personal grievance: that Western music institutions create separate categories for non-Western genres as a way of acknowledging commercial reality while preserving the general-field competition for Western artists. If other Asian and non-Western acts follow, it turns a single withdrawal into institutional pressure.

What to watch

  • Whether other K-pop or Asian artists join the withdrawal.
  • Whether the Recording Academy modifies the category structure before the submission deadline.
  • How many artists who are eligible for the new category choose to submit versus boycott.

ブリーフィングをメールで